San Luis Valley Colorado. Run Like A Third World Shithole!

Lets face the facts, some people are too stupid to run a government. Why would we allow people who can’t run an effective private business run our governments as for profit? Can’t you see the problem? Look… county sheriffs and other administrators…. you ain’t the best or the brightest… more people didn’t vote for you than voted for you, you got maybe, if all your friends and neighbors came out on voting day, you got maybe 13% of the eligible vote. That means that 87% of the “people” purposely said no. We know you’re no math whiz so I’ll tell you that’s a lot of people saying no. Judges get about the same support, mayors too. Just to be clear me not voting is saying no and denying your fictional corporate existence!

“Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

San Luis Valley Colorado Policing for Profit by Incompetent State Workers that are Unable to Succeed in the Real World.

The San Luis Valley police think that your personal business is their “OFFICIAL BUSINESS“! They seriously think that just because you have decided to go outside of your home that suddenly you are fair game for revenue generation. Funny thing though, they don’t harass and ticket everyone. Just the people they don’t know or who don’t work for the county or have a relative that works for the county. It’s hard to raise revenue on your next door neighbor or your family and would be far better to inconvenience out of towners and strangers and have them come back, weeks from now, even if they’re from out of state, for a court date so the prosecutor can have a go at them in his “jurisdiction” for further revenue generation, who knows, the guilty party might even incriminate themselves further by actually speaking and making claims!

The cop can only pull you over only if he is witness to a real crime (traffic infractions are not a crime). He then declares an emergency via his emergency lights (in some states this is a felony if no emergency). His “detainment” is in fact an arrest. Anything you say WILL be used against you. You would be a fool to say anything, would you not? An absolute FOOL!

Did you know?

Using the lights and sirens and declaring an emergency when there is none is like yelling fire in a movie theater. A crime. Of course it would only make sense that if some armed stranger tries to stop you for nothing, then intimidates you and uses force to get money from you to support their “organizational fiction” is a crime… no matter what costume they wear.

Emergency lights were developed as a weapon. Using them is an assault.

Of course, as many already know photosensitive epilepsy (PSE) is a form of epilepsy in which seizures are triggered by visual stimuli that form patterns in time or space, such as flashing lights, bold, regular patterns, or regular moving patterns and is well known about. You might not even notice a small seizure.

Another phenomenon known as chromostereopsis, which the American National Standard Institute (ANSI/HFES-200, Part 5) defines as “the perception of depth resulting from the close proximity of two colors of disparate wavelengths” which basically blinds and confuses you. We’ve all experienced this but were probably too confused to realize it. It’s like driving with one eye closed. Why on earth you would be using these things on the road is beyond my comprehension. People on the road don’t need to be confused and blinded for the County fictions perceived revenue shortfalls and inability to budget. It’s certainly a problem for motorists but it seems to me it would create an even more dangerous situation for police officers who have to make out shapes and distances in visually confusing lighting situations after they pull you over for nothing. Is this their idea of public safety?

Lets not even mention all the radio frequencies these fools are subjecting themselves to…sigh… that shit is created to make you angry. It’s not even a question that these people will be suffering brain cancer and other cancers. This is a proven scientific fact based on real studies. It’s a 100% certainty that microwave exposure causes cancer. The effects of microwaves are cumulative so before they die of cancer they will be horribly debilitated with joint issues and constant ear ringing and headaches, eye problems, etc…. They will be absolutely suicidal. What could go wrong?

Road Rage Explained? Cell Phone Radiation Lowers Impulse Control, Disrupts Blood Brain Barrier

This is one reason why so many cops fly into a rage and start making threats of violence upon average men and women and innocent travelers just trying to go about their daily interests and feeding their families and whatnot.

The policy enforcers and revenue extractors are not angry initially. Initially they are confused, and the confusion builds up like a volcano and eventually explodes onto the poor traveler exercising his rights and possibly daring to want to know why he is being arrested and assaulted. Are you questioning the ultimate authority granted by the costume and the badge? Remember, these so called deputies are not even elected officials and if only one mentally retarded midget ran for sheriff and voted for his damn self he would be in charge… make no mistake. Someone, no matter how fucking incompetent, must be in charge of the public!

This, of course, defies logic and reason.

Anger can be expressed towards others, and it can be expressed towards yourself in many ways that are self-destructive and can end up destroying the revenue generators self-confidence and self-esteem… little man syndrome… Angry people hate themselves, you think people that hate themselves respect you? Why deal with those who don’t respect you and are only trying to generate revenue? What are we?

Constant anger and confusion leads to forgetfulness, but the policy enforcers are expected to be the perfect witness above reproach. The whole system is an assault on logical thinking people.

Another reason why the cops are so angry is that believing lies like they do about authority and Jurisdiction and whatnot creates even more confusion because there is a part of them that knows the truth and yet tries to deny it, a paycheck depends on it and that creates internal conflict and mental confusion, which is the the seed and the fuel for frustration which quickly turns into anger. They can’t possibly think it’s ok to pull over a woman on her way to work so they can issue a bullshit citation all so they can pad their pension fund and add to the corporate fictions holdings, meet some quota… CAN THEY?!? Can they really be that stupid and delusional?

When you get singled out and selected for revenue generation, if you lose your job because you are an hour late, who cares? Corporate “persons” have no other responsibility than to provide revenue for state freeloaders like cops, judges, prosecutors, the mayor, city council dickheads and other parasitic state workers. If you ever dared to challenge them they would rule no injury occurred while charging you even more money (despite the unemployment) for the use of the so called court already paid for with your tax dollars.

Wouldn’t a real leader address these real issues instead of scheming to steal even more money via policing for profit?

But really, I can almost understand their confusion, somehow they got it into their heads that YOU are a corporate fiction and THEY are “the people”.

The county court docs says THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO vs YOUR GOVERNMENT ISSUED CORPORATE FICTION or STRAW MAN (legal name). In this way they think they have somehow gained Jurisdiction and can exercise authority over you. Of course, only over your artificial person. They actually look at you as a corporation that can’t be injured, I’m serious. When they arrest you it’s actually a sort of confiscation of property they think they own via your copyrighted legal fiction (name). They label you a corporation and corporations are a creation of the state, the state gives the corporation the rights to exist. Only the corporation has duties to the one who gave it existence. They labeled you a “person”.

A person is: “in law, an individual or incorporated group having certain legal rights and responsibilities”. A natural person is a human being, while an artificial person is often a corporation. And the artificial version can be either a singular or plural person.

Do they really think they are “the people” referenced in the state constitution? Do they think they created themselves so they could rule over us or did we (the actual people) create them and have the rights to retain control over our creation? Like I said, these people are mentally ill. They think their fiction is “the people” with unalienable rights and that we are the corporations they rule over. You have to wonder did they push for the legalization of Marijuana or did they fight it tooth and nail to protect their corporate profits. Did they write the Constitution or was that another “people”? The fraud becomes clear with just a little bit of critical thought.

Then we have this jewel:

ALL GOVERNMENTAL DEPARTMENTS MUST ANSWER TO THE PEOPLE. It is well that all departments give pause, that they may not offend. All must answer to the people, in and from whom, as specifically set forth in this section, all political power is invested and derived. Hudson v. Annear, 101 Colo. 551, 75 P.2d 587 (1938). (copyrighted opinions referenced under fair use)

Are they government or the people?!?… I’m confused now!

The created STATE OF COLORADO government cannot define the rights of their creator, the actual people. Who are they to say you need any sort of licensing, insurance or registration to carry on with your personal business. You will find, upon study that the road pirates jurisdiction is limited to commercial activities only.

Or are you an artificial “person”? Oh the word trickery! This is Justice though, not a scam…

What is interesting is that the artificial person or corporation (all of them except your artificial person, it seems), enjoys the advantage of equal protection and due process of the government, but does not have the same responsibilities of the individual artificial person or “citizen” in their fictional world. You see quickly that the “person” definition only makes sense if it was written for government employees and the corporations granted privilege by the government to exist. I personally receive no benefit and have no responsibilities to government, therefore I am not an artificial person, therefore they have no Jurisdiction. Good luck trying to get this point across in a so called court though. They are only set up to tell you, like dictators, what’s going to happen, not investigate or come to logical, truthful conclusions.

The created government cannot define the rights of their creator, the people. Three forms of law were granted to the Constitution, common law, equity (contract law) and Admiralty law. Each had their own jurisdiction and purpose. Under what form of law are the local, so called courts, operating?

When you challenge the jurisdiction and authority of state employees you will get the old “Sovereign Citizen” script. Every government parasite from the lowest deputy to the supreme court judge all know the same “Sovereign Citizen” script… they failed to get the multitudes of supreme court rulings on the rights to travel but somehow have received and disseminated the “Sovereign Citizen” script to all county administrators. To be sure “Sovereign Citizen” is a contradiction in terms. Also we have this:

The Constitution of Colorado provides and derives its authority from the sovereignty of the people and is the foremost source of state law.

Then we have these, just a few, rulings.

Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.”

Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”

Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”

Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;

Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”

Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”

Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”

Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.

These are just a few. Remember:

Officers of the court have no immunity when violating a constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.